An excerpt from Nicholas Carr’s book, The Shallows
: What the Internet is Doing to our Brains (W. W.
Norton, June 2010) appeared in Wired
(June 2010, pp. 112-118). Here is an excerpt from that excerpt—which though
brief, strikes me as rather compelling evidence that The Shallows
falls into the Must Reading category. Even for those
whose time is already fully consumed with busyness, activities, commuting, the
media, work, and need I mention, the online world of the Internet.
The mental
consequences of our online info-crunching are not universally bad. Certain
cognitive skills are strengthened by our use of computers and the Net. These
tend to involve more primitive mental functions, such as hand-eye coordination,
reflex response, and the processing of visual cues. One much-cited study of
videogaming, published in Nature in
2003, revealed that after just 10 days of playing action games on computers, a
group of young people had significantly boosted the speed with which they could
shift their visual focus between various images and tasks.
It’s likely that Web
browsing also strengthens brain functions related to fast paced
problem-solving, particularly when it requires spotting patterns in a welter of
data. A British study of the way women search for medical information online
indicated that an experienced Internet user can, at least in some cases, assess
the trustworthiness and probable value of a Web page in a matter of seconds.
The more we practice surfing and scanning, the more adept our brain becomes at
those tasks. (Other academics, like Clay Shirky, maintain that the Web provides
us with a valuable outlet for a growing “cognitive surplus.”)
But it would be a
serious mistake to look narrowly at such benefits and conclude that the Web is
making us smarter. In a Science
article published in early 2009, prominent developmental psychologist Patricia
Greenfield reviewed more than 40 studies of the effects of various types of
media on intelligence and learning ability. She concluded that “every medium
develops some cognitive skills at the expense of others.” Our growing use of
the Net and other screen based technologies, she wrote, has led to the
“widespread and sophisticated development of visual-spatial skills.” But those
gains go hand in hand with a weakening of our capacity for the kind of “deep
processing” that underpins “mindful knowledge acquisition, inductive analysis,
critical thinking, imagination, and reflection.”
We know that the human
brain is highly plastic; neurons and synapses change as circumstances change.
When we adapt to a new cultural phenomenon, including the use of a new medium,
we end up with a different brain, says Michael Merzenich, a pioneer of the
field of neuroplasticity. That means our online habits continue to reverberate
in the workings of our brain cells even when we’re not at a computer. We’re
exercising the neural circuits devoted to skimming and multitasking while
ignoring those used for reading and thinking deeply.
Last year, researchers
at Stanford found signs that this shift may already be well under way. They
gave a battery of cognitive tests to a group of heavy media multitaskers as
well as a group of relatively light ones. They discovered that the heavy
multitaskers were much more easily distracted, had significantly less control
over their working memory, and were generally much less able to concentrate on
a task. Intensive multitaskers are “suckers for irrelevancy,” says Clifford
Nass, one professor who did the research. “Everything distracts them."
Merzenich offers an even bleaker assessment: As we multitask online, we are
“training our brains to pay attention to the crap.”
This entry was posted
at Thursday, June 03, 2010
and is filed under
Internet,
Science,
Thinking
. You can follow any responses to this entry through the
comments feed
.